Alberto Luaces writes:
> Loic Dachary writes:
>> I'm not sure how to proceed but the rule could probably be deduced
>> from the packages with "dfsg" in their name. I think it needs to be
>> removed from the tarball as well, otherwise debian will indeed
>> distribute proprietary software in the main section.
> Thanks for the hint, I will make a little research on that topic.
It seems that this information would fit the bill (removing the
offending files from the tarball and add a README.Debian-source file and
"dfsg" to the name of the package):
Pkg-osg-devel mailing list