On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:58:56 +0200, colliar wrote: > On 27/10/12 17:12, David Paleino wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:33:05 +0200, colliar wrote: > > > >> Please, introduce the unstable version into wheezy (testing), > > > > I can't, sorry. > > We should ask for an exception !
We're quite late in the freeze, and the diff between the two versions is quite large. > >> as a version before the changes needed to work after the licence change > >> does not match Debian release policy. > > > > What problems does it have, exactly? > > 1. Major concern is an OSM api change in July. see (r5326, r5328, r5332, > r5333, r5334, r5346, r5349, r5350, r5351) Could these be backported to 5267? > 2. The redaction bot introduced hidden OSM object versions which led to NPEs > with the history viewer and validator. Do you have specific commits fixing the above problems? Unfortunately, Debian's release team won't accept the unstable JOSM version into testing, as is. What I can (try to) do is backporting the patches to 5267, and upload that to testing-proposed-updates. Thanks for contacting me, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-osm-maint mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-osm-maint