On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:12:55 +0200, colliar wrote: > Why not just adapt migration policy from testing ? > So testing and stable-backport will be the same version.
I can try. > I do not know your update circles. But I would expect experimental to > have at maximum a delay of ten days compared to JOSM tested and unstable > one month. > > ATM (numbers from  and ): > - experimental (r5759) - six weeks > - unstable (r5608) - 20 weeks > - testing (r5267 with some patches) - at least eight month > - stable (r3376) - two years and nine month This is because I have a stable internet connection only on weekends. During the week, I work far from my home city, and only have 100MB/day of bandwidth. And, please understand, that downloading and uploading josm would suck ~30MB of that. Thanks for understanding, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-osm-maint mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-osm-maint