Review for Source Package: libfile-sharedir-perl
[Summary]
A relatively small Perl module providing access to read-only data in common
file system directories, such as /usr/share for distro data or corresponding
Perl module/CPAN directories. There isn't a lot of upstream activity and
maintenance is sporadic (but not a lot of activity expected for this kind of
module).
MIR team ACK
With some recommended TODOs below
This does not need a security review
List of specific binary packages to be promoted to main:
- libfile-sharedir-perl
Specific binary packages built, but NOT to be promoted to main:
- None
Notes:
#0 Upstream activity and package maintenance is sporadic. The owning team might
need to help out in urgent situations.
Required TODOs:
#1 libfile-sharedir-install-perl MIR dependency, bug #2039569 [done]
Recommended TODOs:
#2 The package should get a team bug subscriber before being promoted
#3 Investigate the dh_auto_test (&autopkgtest) non-failures (but error
messages). Should those "missing" recommends fail the test and be skipped
instead?
- Error: Can't locate List/MoreUtils.pm
- Error: Can't locate Params/Util.pm
[Rationale, Duplication and Ownership]
OK:
- There is no other package in main providing the same functionality.
- A team is committed to own long term maintenance of this package.
=> ubuntu-server
- The rationale given in the report seems valid and useful for Ubuntu
=> runtime dependency of libmail-dmarc-perl
[Dependencies]
OK:
- no -dev/-debug/-doc packages that need exclusion
- No dependencies in main that are only superficially tested requiring
more tests now.
Problems:
- other Dependencies to MIR due to this:
libfile-sharedir-install-perl, bug #2039569
[Embedded sources and static linking]
OK:
- no embedded source present
- no static linking
- does not have unexpected Built-Using entries
- not a go package, no extra constraints to consider in that regard
- not a rust package, no extra constraints to consider in that regard
Problems: None
[Security]
OK:
- history of CVEs does not look concerning
- does not run a daemon as root
- does not use webkit1,2
- does not use lib*v8 directly
- does not parse data formats (files [images, video, audio,
xml, json, asn.1], network packets, structures, ...) from
an untrusted source.
- does not expose any external endpoint (port/socket/... or similar)
- does not process arbitrary web content
- does not use centralized online accounts
- does not integrate arbitrary javascript into the desktop
- does not deal with system authentication (eg, pam), etc)
- does not deal with security attestation (secure boot, tpm, signatures)
- does not deal with cryptography (en-/decryption, certificates,
signing, ...)
- this makes appropriate (for its exposure) use of established risk
mitigation features (dropping permissions, using temporary environments,
restricted users/groups, seccomp, systemd isolation features,
apparmor, ...)
Problems: None
[Common blockers]
OK:
- does not FTBFS currently
- does have a test suite that runs at build time
- test suite fails will fail the build upon error.
- does have a non-trivial test suite that runs as autopkgtest
- This does not need special HW for build or test
- if a non-trivial test on this level does not make sense (the lib alone
is only doing rather simple things), is the overall solution (app+libs)
extensively covered i.e. via end to end autopkgtest ?
=> Further tests in libmail-dmarc-perl + libtest-file-sharedir-perl
- no new python2 dependency
- not a Python package
- not a Go package
Problems: None
[Packaging red flags]
OK:
- Ubuntu does not carry a delta
- symbols tracking not applicable for this kind of code.
- debian/watch is present and looks ok (if needed, e.g. non-native)
- the current release is packaged
- promoting this does not seem to cause issues for MOTUs that so far
maintained the package
- no massive Lintian warnings
- debian/rules is rather clean
- It is not on the lto-disabled list
Problems:
- Upstream update history is sporadic
- Debian/Ubuntu update history is sporadic
[Upstream red flags]
OK:
- no warnings during the build
- no incautious use of malloc/sprintf (the language has no direct MM)
- no use of sudo, gksu, pkexec, or LD_LIBRARY_PATH (usage is OK inside tests)
- no use of user nobody
- no use of setuid / setgid
- no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu
- no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit, seed or libgoa-*
- not part of the UI for extra checks
- no translation present, but none needed for this case (user visible)?
Problems:
- Errors during the build (during dh_auto_test, but seems to be fine as it's
about "missing" recommends: "#TODO recommends")
Error: Can't locate List/MoreUtils.pm
Error: Can't locate Params/Util.pm
** Changed in: libfile-sharedir-perl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: libfile-sharedir-perl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Debian
Perl Group, which is subscribed to libfile-sharedir-perl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039566
Title:
[MIR] libfile-sharedir-perl (as a libmail-dmarc-perl dependency)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfile-sharedir-perl/+bug/2039566/+subscriptions
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~pkg-perl-maintainers
Post to : pkg-perl-maintainers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~pkg-perl-maintainers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
