Hi Andreas, On 26-05-2022 06:17, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 03:55:14PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:Looking at https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/netpbm-free_2:10.98.00-1.html, is there any reason why you didn't add "Provides: libnetpbm9-dev, libnetpbm10-dev"?Changed in Git[1] to prepare another upload to new. Thanks for pointing this out Andreas. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/netpbm/-/commit/c43a904be6ec36105e6f5ddd8bb73ecec4bd0c74
I checked today why dose [1] was still reporting this issue today. Although your last commit in salsa suggests you intended to upload, the package didn't appear in the archive yet. Also, it seems to me that in the above commit you added the "Provides" to the library instead of the development package. Was that on purpose and am I missing something or was that a mistake?
Paul[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/1657256405/amd64.html
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
