In gmane.linux.debian.devel.phototools Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: >> In gmane.linux.debian.devel.phototools Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> [...] >>> left to get things right I think it would be better to ship a fairly >>> well tested enblend 3.0 + hugin 0.6
>> I am not 100% sure, but I think the chance for shipping hugin 0.6 in >> lenny is gone. hugin was removed from testing end of May, and I do not >> think there is a precedent of packages being *added* to testing >> without going through sid. Sid has the SVN snapshot and not 0.6 >> though. > Nobody speaks about adding packages to testing. I can't see a big > problem in getting a freeze exception, at least not if it is uploaded soon. Hello, looks like I was not clear enough, let me clarify: Sebastian was talking about shipping hugin 0.6 in lenny. Since testing does not contain any version of hugin and sid contains an SVN snapshot shipping hugin 0.6 in lenny would require adding hugin 0.6 directly to testing.[1] cu andreas [1] There is also the theoretical possibility of uploading hugin 0.6 with an epoch to sid, superseding the svn snapshot. -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' _______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
