Your message dated Thu, 14 May 2015 20:53:51 +0200 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line bug resolved has caused the Debian Bug report #785163, regarding darktable: package dependency on libjs-scriptaculous:amd64 prevents installation to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 785163: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785163 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: darktable Version: darktable:amd64 1.4.2-1+b3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? I asked aptitude to install darktable:amd64 on a newly upgraded jessie multiarch system. Dpkg reports as follows: : nr@homedog 10074 ; dpkg --print-architecture i386 : nr@homedog 10075 ; dpkg --print-foreign-architectures amd64 * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? Marking the package with the plus sign resulted in an error messages that two dependencies of darktable:amd64 are not satisfied. They are libjs-prototype:amd64 libjs-scriptaculous:amd64 These packages, without the :amd64 suffix, are installed on my system, and dpkg -s reports Architecture: all I suspect that something may be wrong with the dependencies. * What outcome did you expect instead? I expected the darktable:amd64 package to be installed. Two other points: - I know that in order to run the darkable binary, I will need to be running a 64-bit kernel. - As you may know, darktable does not work very well when it is limited to 4GB of main memory, and upstream recommends to run the 64-bit version. I have had installed the 32-bit version and can confirm there are significant usability problems. Thus, the inability to install the 64-bit version has a major effect on usability. *** End of the template - remove these template lines *** -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Foreign Architectures: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Since the appropriate bugs have been filed on reverse dependencies of darktable, I'm closing this bug. d
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
