Hello Roger, Roger Leigh [2013-05-20 1:41 +0100]: > I've just uploaded postgresql-debversion to experimental (currently > in NEW) since it adds a postgresql-9.3-debversion package. This now > builds extensions for 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3. > > I was just wondering what the intention was for support of all these > versions in unstable and for jessie.
Christoph and I talked about this the other day. So far the plan was to upload 9.3 to unstable once its release candidate is out. At this point we'll deprecate 9.1 from unstable, ask maintainers to update their extensions to 9.3, and remove 9.1 from unstable. I think 9.2 should never hit unstable, as it will only cause extra work to get rid of its reverse dependencies again. For Jessie I think we'll ship 9.3 or 9.4, depending on how long it takes this time. But as with previous Debian releases, the goal is to only support one major version, plus perhaps the old version's -plperl to faciliate upgrades. Does that sound ok? Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) _______________________________________________ Pkg-postgresql-public mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-postgresql-public
