Re: To [email protected] 2014-07-05 <[email protected]> > I added 9.4 (and 9.5) jobs to the pgapt jenkins some weeks ago and > built some modules. 9 green, 2 yellow (built but autopkgtests fail), > and 6 reds don't look too bad. Some of the failures are because the > packages don't have 9.4 (or "all") in debian/pgversions yet, or other > trivial problems. I'll investigate those. > > Generally I think 9.4 won't be a big porting hurdle, but of course > individual packages have, well, individual problems. pl/R isn't really > special, that's one of the "green" ones. PostGIS is of course much > more involved. Markus?
I've created a wiki page to track progress: https://wiki.debian.org/pkg-postgresql/migration94 > I'll start by uploading pg-common to experimental with 9.4 added to > the supported-versions (with 9.3 still default so we don't have to > roll back anything). That's done, and the first modules have already passed NEW. > I'll poke the PG people if there's any ETA for beta2. TBD. Re: Markus Wanner 2014-07-05 <[email protected]> > On 07/05/2014 04:33 PM, Christoph Berg wrote: > > PostGIS is of course much more involved. Markus? > > PostGIS built just fine after a minor patch to calm down the psql > client. That extension certainly is no hindrance for 9.4 in Jessie. Excellent. Let me know when you need an upload to experimental. (You'll need to B-D on postgresql-server-dev-all (>= 158~).) Christoph -- [email protected] | http://www.df7cb.de/ _______________________________________________ Pkg-postgresql-public mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-postgresql-public
