Re: Evgeni Golov 2017-01-04 <[email protected]> > Hey, > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:58:14PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: > > as postgresql-9.6 seems to be the postgresql version released with > > stretch, is it (and postgresql-common) planed to be backported to > > jessie-backports? > > PostgreSQL has a very colorful bikeshed at [1], which is maintained by > the official maintainers. Any reason not to use that?
The last round of jessie-to-wheezy backports was done because a customer was specifically asking for sparc packages which apt.postgresql.org doesn't provide. As much as I like backports, I'd rather not have to do yet another set of uploads on each round of PostgreSQL minor releases. Christoph
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-postgresql-public mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-postgresql-public
