On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:33 AM, David Henningsson <[email protected]> wrote: > (Moved to pkg-pulseaudio-devel mailinglist) > > On 2014-09-23 02:05, Luke Yelavich wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:35:06AM AEST, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:07 PM, David Henningsson >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2014-09-22 20:58, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So, if I understand correctly, the current situation is the following: >>>>> >>>>> 1. oFono patches have been fully merged. >>>>> 2. Wim Taymans patches have not been merged yet (or at least not >>>>> completely) >>>>> 3. Even if Wim's patches are merged, we (debian) will have to choose >>>>> between oFono or native at compile time. >>>>> 4. Either patchset is not complete, in that one supports HSP and the >>>>> other >>>>> HFP. >>>>> 5. In practice, the above is not terribly important, because most >>>>> devices support both. >>>>> 6. oFono requires manual configuration by the user. >>>>> >>>>> With the above understanding, I'm thinking that we could work around >>>>> problem 3 by building pulseaudio twice and shipping the relevant >>>>> modules in separate conflicting packages. Not sure if that would be >>>>> too confusing for users. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have had the same thought (shipping one pulseaudio-module-bluetooth >>>> and >>>> one pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-ofono) for Ubuntu, maybe we can >>>> collaborate >>>> on the packaging? >>> >>> >>> I'd be more than happy. It appears that the packages have diverged >>> quite a bit, so we need to work something out (but perhaps that is OT >>> for this list?). >>> >>> Our current packaging is maintained in git[1]. We use the regular >>> git-buildpackage workflow. I'm not finding where the equivalent >>> repository is for Ubuntu (does one exist?). > > > The current repository is here: > https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-audio-dev/pulseaudio/ubuntu
Cool, thanks. > > We're still on PulseAudio 4.0, because 5.0 did not contain enough > interesting things IMO, but I plan to upgrade to 6.0 once it is released. > >>> [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-pulseaudio/pulseaudio.git >> >> >> We currently keep our packaging in bzr, but perhaps we should do what is >> done for many other packages in Ubuntu, and keep our packaging in a branch >> in the Debian git repo. I believe David is a member of pkg-pulse, and I am >> also. We'd lose history, but that is a small price to pay for easy >> cherry-picking of patches between the distros. I'd be happy to help get this >> sorted. > > > From a quick googling, it looks like "bzr fast-export | git fast-import" > should do the trick. Yes, but at some point we need to do a fake merge in order to be able to pick changes from each other. Otherwise there will be two separate histories. > > For my own part, I don't mind moving to git for the packaging. I'll have to > learn the git-buildpackage workflow though. It is not complicated. There is a fairly good manual here[1]. [1] http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.html -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-pulseaudio-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-pulseaudio-devel
