On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 07:19:39PM +0200, Philippe Ombredanne wrote: > Note that I am not asking for a permissive license: I would be quite
Oh, sorry, that wasn't clear to me. I'd be fine in this case with a scope-limited reciprocal license like indeed LGPL (2+ or 3+, depending on what's needed in the rest of the code base). > That's a fair point, but I was making a case not only for my code but > other existing projects that use a permissive license and call > python-debian code. Well, nobody else asked, so let's deal with your specific need/request for now. Cheers -- Stefano Zacchiroli . [email protected] . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader & OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » -- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-python-debian-maint
