Your message dated Sat, 26 Dec 2020 21:42:16 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#963456: ruby-rufus-scheduler: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
"ruby2.7" failed: Failure/Error: expect(job.last_work_time).to be < 0.099
has caused the Debian Bug report #963456,
regarding ruby-rufus-scheduler: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed:
Failure/Error: expect(job.last_work_time).to be < 0.099
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
963456: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963456
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-rufus-scheduler
Version: 3.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Error: expect(job.last_work_time).to be < 0.099
>
> expected: < 0.099
> got: 0.10010075569152832
> # ./spec/job_spec.rb:634:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
>
> Finished in 3 minutes 15.5 seconds (files took 0.24951 seconds to load)
> 353 examples, 1 failure, 2 pending
>
> Failed examples:
>
> rspec ./spec/job_spec.rb:622 # Rufus::Scheduler::Job work time
> #mean_work_time gathers work times and computes the mean
>
> /usr/bin/ruby2.7
> -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.9.2/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.9.1/lib
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.9.1/exe/rspec
> --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb --format documentation failed
> ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed:
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/06/20/ruby-rufus-scheduler_3.4.2-1_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 21/06/20 at 22:08 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: ruby-rufus-scheduler
> Version: 3.4.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Not reproducible anymore => closing this bug
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
