On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 11:04:46PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > I've marked this package for ACCEPT. > > However, there's one borderline issue that I'm going to allow through > NEW, because I don't believe it impacts our distributability, however > it's likely an RC bug IMHO. > > The debian/coypright file describes source files, not binaries. It > looks like you've added GPL-3+ because of the GDBM implementation we > link to, which is a welcome degree of diligence I do appreciate, but > it may change without the involvement of this source package (if the > implementation were to change, or how a downstream changes the way the > deb is built). If we had to list all the licensing information of all > our build-deps / links, things would get very messy indeed! I'd expect > someone to look through the dependency tree iff they need to determine > the binary distribution terms. > > If you could upload a new version of this package with a fixed > d/coypright, that'd be super helpful!
Fair enough, thanks for the feedback. I will make a new upload dropping those notes. Also, thanks for handling this quickly.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
