Hi! Thanks for write me.
On Sun Mar 1, 2026 at 11:50 AM -03, Simon Quigley wrote: > Hello, > > I don't understand this reject. I have a license stanza in the copyright file > specifically for lib/httpx/domain_name.rb - it could be renamed to Expat, but > I'm not sure why it was rejected since that's usually just a comment. As I can see in [0] the lincense for domain_name.rb corresponds to BSD-2-Clause, but in d/copyright refer to a MIT license: Files: lib/httpx/domain_name.rb Copyright: 2011-2017 Akinori MUSHA License: MIT > > Could you please clarify? Do I need to modify my copyright file further? Please let me know if you have an objection with that. If not let me know when you uploaded it I can review it again. Thanks! > > Thanks, > Simon Quigley > [email protected] > > On February 28, 2026 11:00:08 PM CST, Emmanuel Arias <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >>Thanks for your contributions to Debian! >> >>I leave some comments: >>- Please review the lib/httpx/domain_name.rb file license >>- Please consider run autopkgtest. >> >>Further information may be found at: >> https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/ruby-httpx >> >>Regards, Emmanuel Arias >>Member of the DFSG, Licensing & New Packages Team >> >> >> >>=== >> >>Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why >>your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our >>concerns. >> [0] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-httpx/-/blob/debian/latest/lib/httpx/domain_name.rb?ref_type=heads -- cheers, Emmanuel Arias ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ [email protected] ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: 13796755BBC72BB8ABE2AEB5 FA9DEC5DE11C63F1 ⠈⠳⣄ _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
