On Sunday 28 September 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: > Isn't this a bug of our upgrading tools, that should prefer to install > a new, non-obsolete package A that Provides: B, rather than keeping a > no-longer-present-in-the-lists B installed?
Possibly. But as long as those tools don't support that it will have to be solved in the packages themselves. Feel free to clone the bug to apt/aptitude/whatever if you feel that should be implemented, but I'd think that would be squeeze material, not lenny. _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
