On 14/10/08 at 18:29 -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:13:34PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi Ryan, > > > > On 13/10/08 at 20:56 -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote: > > > I'd like to join the team. To start off with, I'd like to maintain > > > krb5-auth (kerberos ruby binding) as part of the team. > > > > I've just added you, sorry for the delay. > > > > thanks! > > > > But if there are any (currently packaged) ruby libraries that are > > > orphaned or need some care, I'd be willing to (help) maintain them too > > > (or do anything else that the team needs done). > > > > > > So can I join? (I am ryan52-guest on alioth, if somebody wants to add > > > me :D) > > > > > > And do I ask here for somebody to upload the package for me? or should > > > I ask on mentors (well, I'll ask Guido before I ask on mentors, since > > > he offered)? > > > > > > The packaging is here: > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libkrb5-ruby/libkrb5-ruby_0.7-1.dsc > > > It's lintian clean. > > > I'd be very happy if somebody uploaded this for me. > > > > please svn-inject it in packages-wip. > > svn-injected > > > Some comments: > > why debhelper 7? I haven't following this closely, but AFAIK debhelper 7 > > is still consider unstable, right? > > > > I didn't know what version of debhelper cdbs needs, but 'dh_make > --cdbs' adds a build dependancy on version 7, so I assumed that it > would just be okay to use 7 (better safe than sorry). Should I change > it to something else?
Asking our ftpmasters: 10:36 < lucas> Ganneff/tomv_w: is it recommended to set debian/compat to 7, or to stay at 6, for new packages? 10:37 < pusling> stay at 5 ? 10:37 < Ganneff> stay at what is in etch if you dont need more and love backporters. 10:37 < tomv_w> lucas: as far as we are concened, it doesn't matter 10:37 < Ganneff> go higher if you hate the world or really need some new feature. DO NOT if you dont really need it. 10:37 < Ganneff> for the archive itself it doesnt matter > > I'm not sure if the -doc package is really necessary. Also, are you > > really shipping the content of ext/ as doc? > > > > no, it's generating rdoc html documentation from the source files in > ext. that's what dh_rdoc(1) does (and the stuff from dh_rdoc is all > that's going into that package) ok, fine then -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
