On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 16:07 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do you need me to remove the contrib/boost/include directory from the > > deal.II upstream .tar.gz? I can probably make it work with the headers > > from libboost-dev, with or without contrib/boost in the source tarball. > > You don't need to strip the boost from the upstream tar.gz as long as > those files are never used in the build process.
Okay, it should be easy to make it work that way. > I'd much rather have > the package use the headers from libboost-dev, and I think the > security team would agree with me here. Good point, I hadn't thought of the security implications at all. > > I just uploaded -3 with proper copyright attribution for the deal.II > > contrib/boost directory. (Sorry, forgot about this message while > > building and uploading it, I would have awaited your answer...) > > OK, I'll hold that too, until we resolve this to everybody's > satisfaction. Thanks. Let me know when to build and upload -4 using only libboost-dev headers. And if you could review the new copyright file, that would help too, though I understand if you don't have time just now. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
