Hi!
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:18:44 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I attended a RubyCamp yesterday, which gave a very positive attitude of
> the Ruby community (at least the local one, of course :P).
>
> I discussed the rubygems issue with them, and I think it basically
> boils down to a lack of information on our side. I've tried to rework
> the "Position on rubygems" page, matching how I explained the issue
> during the RubyCamp.
Which lack of information on our side BTW? I always saw the Rubygems
issue as "Rubygems are source-intrusive and hostile to repackaging", and
that is kept on the updated position.
> Links:
> - New pages:
> http://blop.info/pub/rubygems.html
> http://blop.info/pub/upstream-devs.html
> - Old pages:
> http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/rubygems.html
> http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/upstream-devs.html
I'm not doing any work on Ruby packaging right now, so in a sense I'm
not a member of the group anymore, but the new pages look good to me :-)
Thanks a lot for your work!
--
Esteban Manchado Velázquez <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
