Bonjour Laurent, On 24/06/09 at 17:05 +0200, Laurent Vallar wrote: > Hi, > > I did package sinatra web DSL framework, it can be found there : > http://zbla.net/debian/sinatra-0.9.3-1/
I get an error 403 when trying to download the .orig.tar.gz file. > I know there is some lintian bugs, i'll correct it but what to do when > lintian said that : > > W: sinatra: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/sinatra/LICENSE see http://lintian.debian.org/tags/extra-license-file.html You should not install that file in /usr/share/doc/ > I mean sinatra's LICENSE is not like any present in common license > directory... No, but you should copy its content in debian/copyright. > Secondly there is this warning: > > W: sinatra: new-package-should-close-itp-bug > > May I send an ITP ? Can I do that ? Sure. The best way to do that is to use reportbug, but you can do that manually too. Regarding sponsoring, here are some random comments on the package (only looking at the .diff.gz): Priority -> extra Standards-Version: there's a newer version available The description is a bit suboptimal: - usually, think of the short description as something that fits <packagename> is a <short description>. Also, we usually try to avoid judging the package using adjectives like 'Classy' in the description. - in the long desc, start by describing what the package is, not what it isn't. - you can probably drop the whole second paragraph. Since you are using a patch system, it might be a good idea to turn your change of lib/sinatra/main.rb into a patch, and also add a description to explain why that patch is necessary. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [email protected] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [email protected] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
