Hi Paul, On Mon,Jul,20,2009, Paul van Tilburg wrote: > [...] > If a lib is called libfoo-ruby, one always has to wonder whether the > source package is libfoo-ruby, foo-ruby, ruby-foo, rfoo, foo4r, etc. > I know one can do some queries to find out the source package, but as > packager I'd like the consisting naming. > > Why do I bring this up now? Well, because it's easy to rename > source packages before the first upload. Let me know if anyone > disagrees with the old convention, I'm sure we can work it out. > [...]
You're right, the first try was a package called 'sinatra'. But after reading latest Candidate new Ruby policy (v2) from Lucas, i changed the target names. cf. http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2009/04/msg00023.html If it helps :) Kind regards. -- ___ / _/\ Laurent Vallar - Ingénieur Expert - http://conovae.com | (o | GPG Key: 1024D/C4F38417 - http://laurent.vallar.info \__\/ _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
