On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:48:41AM -0400, Christopher Lunsford wrote: > I like the way PAPT's svn is setup. There is no -wip, it's just > toplevel trunk and tags. Upstream source isn't included at all which > saves space. >300M is pretty big. > +1 for mentioning the Vcs-* problem with -wip. >
/me nods. and converting to keep upstream source in SVN would probably be too difficult to do anyway.. -- _________________________ Ryan Niebur [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
