tags 632553 + pending thanks Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > The differences in compatibility levels can be easily documented, see > > "Debhelper compatibility levels" in debhelper(7). It will also make > > disruptive changes in gem2deb much easier to handle in the future, since > > it will not break current packages. > > Hi, > > I don't think that we have the manpower to maintain different > compatibility levels in gem2deb. > It's better to detect (and fix) broken packages when introducing such > changes. Actually I've implemented this in a way that the existing packages will not break and allows maintainers to tell gem2deb to use the directory passed by dh_auto_install. See a56b6bdf for the implementation and 3092732e for some documentation: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/gem2deb.git;a=summary Suggestions and patches are welcome. -- Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]> http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
