Dear Gergely, On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:00:06PM +0000, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Dear maintainer, > Your upload of github-markup has been rejected, because it goes > against the recommended naming policy, which recommends a ruby-$FOO > scheme, unless the package in question is an application, and not a > library, which is not the case here (even though it does contain > executable scripts on the PATH). Therefore, it should be renamed to > ruby-github-markup to comply with the ruby policy. > I would also recommend merging the -doc package into the main binary > package, because frankly, that extra 156k uncompressed is not going to > matter. > Furthermore, the package depends on org-ruby, which I rejected earlier > for similar reasons. I am about to upload a new version for this package, as a result of a collective effort. All the points you have mentioned have been addressed: - package renamed ruby-github-markup, following Ruby team convention, - a unique binary package containing the library and the documentation. Other important modifications are the following: - new upstream version - source repackaged to drop files in tests without license Cheers, Cédric
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
