On 2014-11-11 13:55, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > The Breaks: relationships were there originally, but removing them was > how I achieved a successfull upgrade from wheezy in the first place, > after some hours of trial and error. aptitude would figure the upgrade > out just fine, but apt-get wouldn't.
Maybe we need to add some more Breaks elsewhere to push apt into the right direction ... > Looking back, what I didn't do was upgrading apt first, then upgrading > the rest of the system. Maybe that would help. upgrades must work out successfully with the apt-get from wheezy. Even if you Breaks: apt (<< jessie), apt will be upgraded first, but the apt process running the dist-upgrade is still the old one from wheezy If you can put packages (with a version > jessie) with the Breaks added back somewhere (and add a Packages file, too) I could take a look at what's happening there. Please describe your failing upgrade scenario (wheezy + these packages: foo, bar, baz, ... with/without recommends). Andreas _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
