On 6/25/15, Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: > Not sure... I know systemd can invoke init.d script but only standard > {start| > stop|restart|status} functions and only with the absence of native .service > file.
So if it still supports sysv scripts and native services does not provide additional functions why to add useless native support which breaks enhanced sysv features? > interface to services is quite intentional. Frankly it is annoying when > init.d > script does too much but we can avoid this by offering an additional utility > to do soft restart and you can call it from init.d script as well if you > wish. WE DO NOT NEED ADDITIONAL UTILITIES. DIXI. Init script is well known interface between user and daemon. No need to break with additional utilities. > Shell script could be common and independent from init system. It should be > easier to test and debug as well... I don't think that unicornctl upgrade is more simple that invoke-rc.d unicorn upgrade. > You have to get over it. It was debated enough and Technical Committee has > decided. You still can use init.d if you wish, can you? I don't want somebody to make sysv useless, cutting away features of init scripts just because redhat's crapd does not supports them (but supports a lot of useless crap). >> , it quite similar to the last >> "marriage" in Chechnya (old police bastard and young girl), so I don't >> want to support this. > I do not know this story but from the way you've described it I'm sure that I suppose that you are from RF, according to your surname. It doesn't matter anyway. > your analogy is very inaccurate and unfair. I'm worried about such attitude > of > yours. There are things we may not like. For instance I do not like GNOME > (so > naturally I do not use it) but I don't need to demonise it (e.g. declare it > "Evil" etc.) to justify my preference. SW can't be evil and I didn't call crapd as such. Only people can be, and those who made crapd default in Debian are definitely made evil thing to Debian and Free Software community. > Let's not go there. As maintainer you can't care only about those users who > happened to be using Unicorn on your favourite init system. That kind > hostility is harmful. Please do not discriminate. Your last words sounds like manipulation. _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers