Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:26:19 +0530
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line letsencrypt is now in recommends
has caused the Debian Bug report #818659,
regarding gitlab: please consider making the dependency on letsencrypt optional
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
818659: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818659
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gitlab
Version: 8.4.3+dfsg-12
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
gitlab added letsencrypt as a hard dependency. This leads to the
following additional packages getting installed:
letsencrypt python-acme python-cffi-backend python-chardet
python-configargparse python-configobj python-cryptography
python-dialog python-enum34 python-funcsigs python-idna
python-ipaddress python-letsencrypt python-mock python-ndg-httpsclient
python-openssl python-parsedatetime python-pbr python-pkg-resources
python-psutil python-pyasn1 python-requests python-rfc3339 python-six
python-tz python-urllib3 python-zope.component python-zope.event
python-zope.hookable python-zope.interface
I require none of these packages and they will just take up space on a
system where I have no need for being able to acquire a certificate via
letsencrypt ever.
It also seems that letsencrypt is only used in the postinst script if
the respective debconf variable is set to true. Thus it seems that the
availability of letsencrypt is actually optional and not a hard
dependency of the gitlab system.
Considering these points, could you maybe move the letsencrypt
dependency from Depends into Recommends and adjust the postinst script
to only try using letsencrypt if the binary is available?
Thanks!
cheers, josch
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: fixed -1 8.5.8+dfsg-2
and 8.5.8+dfsg-3 is uploaded to unstable.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
