On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 10:18:54AM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:05:26 +0100 Matthias Klose <[email protected]> wrote: > > rexical ships without a gemspec file, making it useless to fulfil > dependencies. > > Rexical is intended to be used as a Ruby application. The upstream > github repository[1] describes its usage as a binary only, and not as a > library. If you could provide a usecase where rexical is used as a > library, I can try to create a gemspec file for it. > > [1] https://github.com/tenderlove/rexical
I think the origin of this bug report can be traced back to https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/rexical/unstable/amd64/ BTW the package should have a gemfile since the upstream installation instructions are `gem install rexical`. What happens is that we are probably pulling directly from the github repository, which does not have a source gemspec (from what I understand it generates one at release time with code in the Rakefile).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
