Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:26:14 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#860708: ruby-seamless-database-pool: FTBFS on i386: 
ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed: Failure/Error: pool_connection.to_s.should =~ 
/\A#<ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter::Abstract:0x[0-9a-f]+
 3 connections>\z/
has caused the Debian Bug report #860708,
regarding ruby-seamless-database-pool: FTBFS on i386: ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" 
failed: Failure/Error: pool_connection.to_s.should =~ 
/\A#<ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter::Abstract:0x[0-9a-f]+
 3 connections>\z/
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
860708: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860708
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-seamless-database-pool
Version: 1.0.17-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: [email protected]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on i386.

Relevant part (hopefully):
>      Failure/Error: pool_connection.to_s.should =~ 
> /\A#<ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter::Abstract:0x[0-9a-f]+
>  3 connections>\z/
> 
>        expected: 
> /\A#<ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter::Abstract:0x[0-9a-f]+
>  3 connections>\z/
>             got: 
> "#<ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter::Abstract:0x-2ddcab2
>  3 connections>" (using =~)
>        Diff:
>        @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
>        
> -/\A#<ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter::Abstract:0x[0-9a-f]+
>  3 connections>\z/
>        
> +"#<ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter::Abstract:0x-2ddcab2
>  3 connections>"
>      # ./spec/seamless_database_pool_adapter_spec.rb:92:in `block (2 levels) 
> in <top (required)>'
> 
> Deprecation Warnings:
> 
> Using `should_receive` from rspec-mocks' old `:should` syntax without 
> explicitly enabling the syntax is deprecated. Use the new `:expect` syntax or 
> explicitly enable `:should` instead. Called from 
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/spec/connection_statistics_spec.rb:64:in `block (2 levels) 
> in <top (required)>'.
> 
> Using `should` from rspec-expectations' old `:should` syntax without 
> explicitly enabling the syntax is deprecated. Use the new `:expect` syntax or 
> explicitly enable `:should` with `config.expect_with(:rspec) { |c| c.syntax = 
> :should }` instead. Called from 
> /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/spec/connection_statistics_spec.rb:32:in `block (2 levels) 
> in <top (required)>'.
> 
> 
> If you need more of the backtrace for any of these deprecations to
> identify where to make the necessary changes, you can configure
> `config.raise_errors_for_deprecations!`, and it will turn the
> deprecation warnings into errors, giving you the full backtrace.
> 
> 2 deprecation warnings total
> 
> Finished in 0.78735 seconds (files took 1.27 seconds to load)
> 62 examples, 1 failure
> 
> Failed examples:
> 
> rspec ./spec/seamless_database_pool_adapter_spec.rb:91 # 
> SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter should be able to be converted to a string
> 
> /usr/bin/ruby2.3 /usr/bin/rspec --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb --format 
> documentation failed
> ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed: 

The full build log is available from:
   
http://aws-logs.debian.net/2017/04/18/ruby-seamless-database-pool_1.0.17-1_testing-i386.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 19/04/17 at 09:21 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: ruby-seamless-database-pool
> Version: 1.0.17-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
> 
> Hi,
> 
> During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
> sid chroot), your package failed to build on i386.
> 
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> >      Failure/Error: pool_connection.to_s.should =~ 
> > /\A#<ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter::Abstract:0x[0-9a-f]+
> >  3 connections>\z/
> > 
> >        expected: 
> > /\A#<ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter::Abstract:0x[0-9a-f]+
> >  3 connections>\z/
> >             got: 
> > "#<ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter::Abstract:0x-2ddcab2
> >  3 connections>" (using =~)
> >        Diff:
> >        @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> >        
> > -/\A#<ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter::Abstract:0x[0-9a-f]+
> >  3 connections>\z/
> >        
> > +"#<ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter::Abstract:0x-2ddcab2
> >  3 connections>"
> >      # ./spec/seamless_database_pool_adapter_spec.rb:92:in `block (2 
> > levels) in <top (required)>'
> > 
> > Deprecation Warnings:
> > 
> > Using `should_receive` from rspec-mocks' old `:should` syntax without 
> > explicitly enabling the syntax is deprecated. Use the new `:expect` syntax 
> > or explicitly enable `:should` instead. Called from 
> > /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/spec/connection_statistics_spec.rb:64:in `block (2 levels) 
> > in <top (required)>'.
> > 
> > Using `should` from rspec-expectations' old `:should` syntax without 
> > explicitly enabling the syntax is deprecated. Use the new `:expect` syntax 
> > or explicitly enable `:should` with `config.expect_with(:rspec) { |c| 
> > c.syntax = :should }` instead. Called from 
> > /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/spec/connection_statistics_spec.rb:32:in `block (2 levels) 
> > in <top (required)>'.
> > 
> > 
> > If you need more of the backtrace for any of these deprecations to
> > identify where to make the necessary changes, you can configure
> > `config.raise_errors_for_deprecations!`, and it will turn the
> > deprecation warnings into errors, giving you the full backtrace.
> > 
> > 2 deprecation warnings total
> > 
> > Finished in 0.78735 seconds (files took 1.27 seconds to load)
> > 62 examples, 1 failure
> > 
> > Failed examples:
> > 
> > rspec ./spec/seamless_database_pool_adapter_spec.rb:91 # 
> > SeamlessDatabasePoolAdapter should be able to be converted to a string
> > 
> > /usr/bin/ruby2.3 /usr/bin/rspec --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb --format 
> > documentation failed
> > ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed: 
> 
> The full build log is available from:
>    
> http://aws-logs.debian.net/2017/04/18/ruby-seamless-database-pool_1.0.17-1_testing-i386.log

Hi,

I did the archive rebuild that resulted in this bug on a machine with a
jessie kernel. I did another rebuild on a machine with a stretch
kernel, and this failure disappeared.

My best guess is that this has something to do with a stack overflow,
in a way similar to #750593 (see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750593#157 and #797530
(fixed in stretch, not jessie).

Given that this doesn't affect building on a machine with a stretch
kernel, I'm closing the bug.

Lucas

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

Reply via email to