Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2018 21:06:14 +0530 with message-id <7d54b778-6d83-3f77-05ba-9e5f4b64d...@debian.org> and subject line this is already fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #868839, regarding ruby-mustermann: missing Breaks+Replaces: ruby-mustermann19 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 868839: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868839 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: ruby-mustermann,ruby-mustermann19 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Control: found -1 1.0.0-2 Control: found -1 0.4.3+git20160621-1 Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously unselected package ruby-mustermann19. Preparing to unpack .../ruby-mustermann19_0.4.3+git20160621-1_all.deb ... Unpacking ruby-mustermann19 (0.4.3+git20160621-1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/ruby-mustermann19_0.4.3+git20160621-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/ast/boundaries.rb', which is also in package ruby-mustermann 1.0.0-2 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/ruby-mustermann19_0.4.3+git20160621-1_all.deb This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and diversions should only be used when packages provide different implementations for the same functionality. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/ast/boundaries.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/ast/compiler.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/ast/expander.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/ast/node.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/ast/param_scanner.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/ast/parser.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/ast/pattern.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/ast/template_generator.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/ast/transformer.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/ast/translator.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/ast/validation.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/caster.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/composite.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/equality_map.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/error.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/expander.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/extension.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/identity.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/mapper.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/pattern.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/pattern_cache.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/regexp.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/regexp_based.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/regular.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/simple_match.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/sinatra.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/to_pattern.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mustermann/version.rb This bug is assigned to both packages. If you, the maintainers of the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug. Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see https://qa.debian.org/dose/file-overwrites.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Control: fixed -1 1.0.0-3 See https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/r/ruby-mustermann/control-1.0.0-3
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers