On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:41:40AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Hi OpenSSH, shadow Maintainers, > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:32:08AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 06:02:39PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > > > It seems desirable to ship liblastlog2 in trixie, considering that the > > > /var/log/lastlog file is not Y2038-safe and pam in unstable has already > > > dropped pam_lastlog.so, meaning that non-ssh logins are no longer > > > recorded in /var/log/lastlog. > > > [..] > > At the same time, all traditional writing to /var/log/lastlog should > > stop. > > > > So, after some of the current fog clears, src:util-linux could > > introduce new binary packages (at least libpam-lastlog2), but > > src:pam would need to add it to the common-* config files. > > > > Does this seem right? > > Answering my own question, not quite. > > Apparently, traditionally we have: > > * sshd writes to /var/log/lastlog by itself. > * login has pam_lastlog.so in its PAM snippet. > > Both of these would need to be replaced by pam_lastlog2.so. I don't > really know what the other distros are doing right now, and/or if > we should align on this. > > So we could either put pam_lastlog2.so into a common-* file from > src:pam, or openssh and shadow should switch their setup. > > What do we all think about that?
Hi Chris, It doesn't look like upstream shadow is specifying pam_lastlog.so, but debian login does. Putting pam_lastlog2.so into a common-* from src:pam sounds like a good solution. thanks, -serge _______________________________________________ Pkg-shadow-devel mailing list Pkg-shadow-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-shadow-devel
