* Marc Haber <[email protected]> [241029 11:15]: > I apologize for letting this rest for more than two months.
No worries. Have limited bandwidth myself at the moment due to unforeseen occurrences. > Giving the face that shadow already has its own mailing list, it would > probably > make most sense to unite under the roof of the shadow package. Agreed. > Since shadow, adduser and base-passwd are exposed security-wise as well, it > would probably make sense to move the three source packages from the Debian > project to its own Salsa project, probably best called shadow-team. I can kinda see that, but I don't want to do this for util-linux, and then I'm not seeing the extra value. In general for Debian I'd like to see more things move into the debian/ namespace. If people introduce crap -because- of that, then so be it. They can already (NM)U the packages anyway. I'd rather take the extra drive-by help. > We can then decide together whether to move the Maintainer field of > base-passwd > and adduser to [email protected] as well. Adduser has its Maintainer > set > to [email protected], so interested parties can subscribe via the tracker, and > shadow has its Maintainer set to the mailing list. This leaves base-passwd > where there currently is no possibility to see maintainer mail like support > requests, bug reports and other issues. Using the mailing list would seem like it makes the most sense? Teams on tracker.d.o are a bit meh at the moment, given tracker still uses sso.d.o for managing them. I have no clue how to reconcile the mailing list and the <package>@packages.d.o alias however. Open to ideas. Best, Chris _______________________________________________ Pkg-shadow-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-shadow-devel
