Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:31:58 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: systemd: Please package systemd-repart
has caused the Debian Bug report #976959,
regarding systemd: Please package systemd-repart
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
976959: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976959
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: systemd
Version: 246.6-2~bpo10+1
Severity: wishlist
Dear systemd maintainers,
judging from salsa [1] and the file lists of the systemd package on
buster-backports and sid, systemd is currently built without the the
systemd-repart binary.
It would be great if this tool could be distributed either in the systemd
package or, if deemed necessary, as a new package systemd-repart, like
systemd-container.
I think this tool is pretty standalone and its inclusion shouldn't hurt people
not using it, but it would remove the burden of having to rebuild the systemd
package from people wanting to use it.
Thank you for your work!
best regards,
Jörg Behrmann
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/-/blob/debian/master/debian/rules
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.7
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE,
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages systemd depends on:
ii adduser 3.118
ii libacl1 2.2.53-4
ii libapparmor1 2.13.2-10
ii libaudit1 1:2.8.4-3
ii libblkid1 2.33.1-0.1
ii libc6 2.28-10
ii libcap2 1:2.25-2
ii libcryptsetup12 2:2.1.0-5+deb10u2
ii libgcrypt20 1.8.4-5
ii libgnutls30 3.6.7-4+deb10u5
ii libgpg-error0 1.35-1
ii libidn2-0 2.0.5-1+deb10u1
ii libip4tc0 1.8.2-4
ii libkmod2 26-1
ii liblz4-1 1.8.3-1
ii liblzma5 5.2.4-1
ii libmount1 2.33.1-0.1
ii libpam0g 1.3.1-5
ii libpcre2-8-0 10.32-5
ii libseccomp2 2.3.3-4
ii libselinux1 2.8-1+b1
ii libsystemd0 246.6-2~bpo10+1
ii libzstd1 1.4.4+dfsg-3~bpo10+1
ii mount 2.33.1-0.1
ii systemd-timesyncd [time-daemon] 246.6-2~bpo10+1
ii util-linux 2.33.1-0.1
Versions of packages systemd recommends:
ii dbus 1.12.20-0+deb10u1
Versions of packages systemd suggests:
ii policykit-1 0.116-1~~zedv1
ii systemd-container 246.6-2~bpo10+1
Versions of packages systemd is related to:
ii dracut 048+80-2
pn initramfs-tools <none>
pn libnss-systemd <none>
ii libpam-systemd 246.6-2~bpo10+1
ii udev 246.6-2~bpo10+1
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 250.1-2
Forgot to close this bug in the 250.1-2 upload, doing that now.
systemd (250.1-2) experimental; urgency=medium
[ Lukas Märdian ]
* d/rules: Enable build of systemd-oomd
* d/control: Ship oomd in a systemd-oomd package.
Deploying the default configuration as used in Fedora.
* Start systemd-oomd.service after package installation
[ Michael Biebl ]
* oomd: move oomctl to bindir
* Enable systemd-repart and ship it in the main systemd package.
Add fdisk as test dependency, needed by test-repart which calls sfdisk.
* test-repart: append /sbin and /usr/sbin to $PATH= so sfdisk can be found
-- Michael Biebl <[email protected]> Sat, 08 Jan 2022 23:45:06 +0100
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
