Am 04.09.22 um 18:40 schrieb Bernhard Übelacker:

Package: systemd-container
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: bernha...@mailbox.org


Dear Maintainer,
I tried to run on top of a buster system
with systemd-container 241-7~deb10u8 to start a container
with a current bookworm chroot with systemd-container 251.4-3.
This buster system was running linux-image 4.19.0-21-amd64.

This failed with following error:

    root@debian:~# systemd-nspawn --directory=/var/lib/machines/test-bookworm --boot --network-veth
     Spawning container test-bookworm on /var/lib/machines/test-bookworm.
     Press ^] three times within 1s to kill container.
    systemd 251.4-3 running in system mode (+PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX +APPARMOR +IMA +SMACK +SECCOMP +GCRYPT -GNUTLS +OPENSSL +ACL +BLKID +CURL +ELFUTILS +FIDO2 +IDN2 -IDN +IPTC +KMOD +LIBCRYPTSETUP +LIBFDISK +PCRE2 -PWQUALITY -P11KIT -QRENCODE +TPM2 +BZIP2 +LZ4 +XZ +ZLIB +ZSTD -BPF_FRAMEWORK -XKBCOMMON +UTMP +SYSVINIT default-hierarchy=unified)
     Detected virtualization systemd-nspawn.
     Detected architecture x86-64.

     Welcome to Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid!

     Hostname set to <debian>.
     Failed to create /init.scope control group: Operation not permitted
     Failed to allocate manager object: Operation not permitted
     [!!!!!!] Failed to allocate manager object.
     Exiting PID 1...
     Container test-bookworm failed with error code 255.


So this report is mostly to ask if this expected or desired to work?

Good question. Maybe raise that on the systemd-devel mailing list?
Keep in mind, that in bullseye we switched to cgroupv2, i.e. we build systemd with -Ddefault-hierarchy=unified

I'm honestly not sure which combination of versions (and cgroup layouts) are supported.

Michael

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to