Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:26:02 +0200
with message-id <704ca9c1-0b69-b35f-226e-be0f1031b...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1018872: closed by Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org>
(Re: Bug#1018872: systemd.service COMMAND LINE misses command search, if
starting with "+".)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1018872,
regarding systemd.service COMMAND LINE misses command search, if starting with
"+".
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1018872: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018872
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: systemd
Version: 247.3-7
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Implementing some systemd.service, which requires preparation by ExecStartPre.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Added: ExecStartPre=+mkdir -p <folder> ; +chown -R <user>:<group> <folder>
* What was the outcome of this action?
Result via service start and via analysing (sudo systemd-analyze verify
<service>):
Command mkdir is not executable: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
* What outcome did you expect instead?
Execution without error message.
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
Workaround using a little different COMMAND LINE:
ExecStartPre=+/bin/mkdir -p <folder> ; +chown -R <user>:<group> <folder
Identified problem:
The command is not found at the standard paths. This happens only, if the
command is prefixed with "+" or (likely) any other possible prefix character,
which "man systemd.service" tells (not tested).
Because the workaround is easy, the bug is classified as minor.
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-16-amd64 (SMP w/3 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages systemd depends on:
ii adduser 3.118
ii libacl1 2.2.53-10
ii libapparmor1 2.13.6-10
ii libaudit1 1:3.0-2
ii libblkid1 2.36.1-8+deb11u1
ii libc6 2.31-13+deb11u3
ii libcap2 1:2.44-1
ii libcrypt1 1:4.4.18-4
ii libcryptsetup12 2:2.3.7-1+deb11u1
ii libgcrypt20 1.8.7-6
ii libgnutls30 3.7.1-5+deb11u1
ii libgpg-error0 1.38-2
ii libip4tc2 1.8.7-1
ii libkmod2 28-1
ii liblz4-1 1.9.3-2
ii liblzma5 5.2.5-2.1~deb11u1
ii libmount1 2.36.1-8+deb11u1
ii libpam0g 1.4.0-9+deb11u1
ii libseccomp2 2.5.1-1+deb11u1
ii libselinux1 3.1-3
ii libsystemd0 247.3-7
ii libzstd1 1.4.8+dfsg-2.1
ii mount 2.36.1-8+deb11u1
ii util-linux 2.36.1-8+deb11u1
Versions of packages systemd recommends:
ii dbus 1.12.20-2
ii systemd-timesyncd [time-daemon] 247.3-7
Versions of packages systemd suggests:
ii policykit-1 0.105-31+deb11u1
pn systemd-container <none>
Versions of packages systemd is related to:
pn dracut <none>
ii initramfs-tools 0.140
ii libnss-systemd 247.3-7
ii libpam-systemd 247.3-7
ii udev 247.3-7
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I'm pretty sure this issue is actually just about a misleading output of
systemd-analyze, which is now tracked in #1019474 (and fixed in unstable)
I'm thus closing this issue here again.
On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:35:37 +0200 Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote:
Control: reopen -1
Am 01.09.22 um 11:10 schrieb Harald Bergmann:
> Hello Michael,
>
> please test the told COMMAND LINE with multiple commands, before closing.
> Many thanks!
>
Re-opening as per your request.
Please provide a way how this can be reproduced. A minimal .service file
showing the issue would be great.
Please also post the corresponding systemctl status output.
Michael
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
