On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 18:56 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 30.09.22 um 18:45 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > Package: debhelper
> > Version: 13.9.1
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > 
> > dh_installsystemd currently creates a maintscript code to mask/unmask any
> > type of unit files (.service, .socket, .timer, etc) if a package is
> > removed/(re)installed.
> > 
> > The masking/unmasking is currently done as packages unfortunately still
> > ship SysV init scripts along side native unit files and as SysV init
> > scripts are typically conffiles, they are not removed on uninstall.
> > So unless the package is purged systemd-sysv-generator will now see a
> > SysV init script and generate a corresponding runtime unit for it.
> > 
> > Ideally, we would not have to manually create those masks.
> > At least we shouldn't do it for non-service units as this can lead to
> > failures e.g. when socket units that are used in a service are still
> > masked.
> > 
> > Example:
> > # apt install -y systemd-oomd; apt remove -y systemd-oomd; apt install -y 
> > systemd-oomd
> > ...
> > Setting up systemd-oomd (251.4-3) ...
> > Failed to restart systemd-oomd.service: Unit systemd-oomd.socket is masked.
> > Could not execute systemctl:  at /usr/bin/deb-systemd-invoke line 145.
> > 
> > 
> > dh_installsystemd should probably create two lists:
> > #UNITFILES# and #SERVICEFILES#
> > and the autoscripts for systemd doing the mask/unmask should only
> > operate on #SERVICEFILES#
> > 
> > There's the problem of existing masks, so we will probably need to
> > create the unmask code in postinst for #UNITFILES# at least for a while
> > longer.
> 
> Another idea how we could drop the need for the masks is to let 
> dh_installinit generate a "chmod -x /etc/init.d/foo" upon package 
> removal (and running a corresponding chmod +x on reinstall).
> systemd-sysv-generator already helpfully ignores any non-executable 
> files in /etc/init.d
> 
> What do others think about this idea?
> 
> Getting rid of the mask/unmask bandaid would be really beneficial.

I like that, sounds simple, low-risk and effective

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to