Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2023 20:39:54 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1028115: init: Document requirements for being an
alternative pre-dependency of init
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028115,
regarding init: Document requirements for being an alternative pre-dependency
of init
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1028115: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028115
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: init
Version: 1.65.2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Dear i-s-h maintainers,
I intend to ask for the inclusion of runit-init into the pre-dep list
of this package right after the bookworm release.
For now I'm following the list of suggestions provided by Simon McVittie [1]
in #923450 msg#15; please document your requirements.
Regards,
Lorenzo
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923450
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 1028115 + wontfix
thanks
On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 18:03:42 +0100 Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> wrote:
On Jan 07, Lorenzo Puliti <[email protected]> wrote:
> For now I'm following the list of suggestions provided by Simon McVittie [1]
> in #923450 msg#15; please document your requirements.
I suggest that proponents of alternative init systems should be able to
show that it is something of at least minimal interest for the Debian
community and not just somebody's pet project.
A possible criteria could be something like being adopted by 1% (5%?) of
popcon users.
As Simon already explained, it is totally possible for an init system to
be usable without being a dependency of init, and indeed systemd did
exactly that in the first years.
The "init" meta package was designed as a means to facilitate the switch
from sysvinit to systemd as default init system in Debian.
What you are asking is not in scope of the init package.
Thus closing as wontfix.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
