On 05/03/2024 at 00:58, Luca Boccassi wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 23:28, Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> wrote:

What's your plan for installing as the secondary boot loader for shim
to call?

'bootctl update' already recognises and prefers foo.efi.signed if
present, so installing to the ESP is easy (PR still doesn't add the
call, will probably add a trigger).

But as you know Shim right now compiles in the filename of the second
stage, so for now interested testers will have to manually rename the
file in the ESP from systemd-bootx64.efi to grubx64.efi, which is of
course not ideal - let's call it a technological preview.

What about the installation of shim files into the ESP along with systemd-boot ? Does bootctl take care of it ? If no, are there any plans to integrate it ?

Also, are there any plans to support multiple ESPs for boot redundancy (e.g. in software RAID setups) ?

Reply via email to