Am 18.05.2014 17:20, schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer: > In contrast to that, we have "passive" dependencies which the services > themselves usually never check (or even cannot really check) for... > typically such, which are security relevant.
I have no idea what you mean with passive dependencies. There is nothing magic regarding dependencies. I guess the only thing you need to know is, that there is a flag called DefaultDependencies=yes|no. The default is yes, if not specified. With this property set, units get a default set of orderings and dependencies. IIRC they slightly differ depending on the unit type, e.g. service or socket. It's comparable to services being started in rc2 and implicitly depending on rcS. If you use DefaultDependencies=no, you'll need to specificy you dependencies explictly. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
