|
On 07/02/2014 06:32 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 02.07.2014 17:23, schrieb VALETTE Eric OLNC/OLPS: >> On 07/02/2014 05:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Never saw a warning and never failed to install anything! I checked the >> test is there in 208 too and it is. >> I even did extract the code and tested it: >> >> needed_symbols='inotify_init signalfd accept4 open_by_handle_at >> timerfd_create epoll_create' >> for symbol in $needed_symbols; do if ! egrep "^[a-fA-F0-9]+ T >> \.?sys_${symbol}$" /proc/kallsyms; then missing_symbol=1; >> abort_install=1; break; fi; done >> ffffffff810e875f T sys_inotify_init >> ffffffff810ebb16 T sys_signalfd >> ffffffff81488a25 T sys_accept4 >> ffffffff810f7391 T sys_open_by_handle_at > > Hm, so CONFIG_FHANDLE is not set by your locally built kernel, yet you > have the sys_open_by_handle_at symbol? > > You mentioned that you installed the standard Debian kernel in between. > I assume you didn't run this test on that kernel but your locally built one? > > If the sys_open_by_handle_at really exist if CONFIG_FHANDLE is disabled, > we need to investigate this further and how to reliably detect that feature. > > Michael > > Sorry this was not clear, I have just checked the scripts works and I did on kernel that had the CONFIG_FHANDLE already. So I do not understand why I never saw a warning. -- eric |
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
