Dear Michael,
Am Freitag, den 26.09.2014, 18:13 +0200 schrieb Michael Biebl: > sorry for not coming back to you earlier. no problem, I’m not in a hurry :-) > Am 04.09.2014 um 23:35 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > > So I’m wondering: Would you be willing to take it over, by building it > > from the systemd source? > > As far as I'm concerned, I wouldn't mind building libnss-myhostname from > the systemd source package. Keep in mind though, that systemd is > linux-any and the old libnss-myhostname was arch any. > > Do you want to keep maintaing libnss-myhostname as a separate source > package for !linux-any or should we just drop it for those > architectures? This would e.g. make freedombox-setup uninstallable on > !linux unless the libnss-myhostname dependency is made arch-dependent. I don’t think its worthwhile maintaining two source packages for essentially the same thing. Wouldn’t it be possible for the systemd source package to build just libnss-myhostname on !linux? But anyways, this bug is a (directed :-)) RFA, and I’d leave that decision to you, or whoever wants to take it over. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
