Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Whether or not one should use aptitude flips around between releases so
> > I believe people will be using it whether or not we recommend it for a
> > particular release.
That's not our issue then IMHO.
> I don't see a way to influence aptitude from within the "init" meta-package.
You can't. The package is fine.
> We could change the transitional sysvinit package, which currently
> pre-depends on "init", and add an explicit Depends: systemd-sysv or
> Recommends: systemd-sysv (untested).
That cries for breakage and restricting the choice between the init
systems.
> I fear though, that this might break other (documented) upgrade paths,
> e.g. for users which want to stick with sysvinit-core.
Yes, I'm quite sure it will.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <[email protected]>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
_______________________________________________
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
