Your message dated Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:22:26 +0300
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: systemd: Please split datetimed and other system services
into a separate package
has caused the Debian Bug report #737600,
regarding systemd: Please split datetimed and other system services into a
separate package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
737600: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737600
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: systemd
Version: 204-6
Severity: wishlist
Dear systemd maintainers,
Background: Currently in gnome-panel we have a patch [1] that reverts the use
of timedated
service, as it is currently impossible to use it without adding a hard
dependency on systemd,
which we would like to avoid.
So I would like you to split datetimed (and probably some other services, like
hostnamed and
localed) into a separate package. Ubuntu has done that (see [2]), so that is
possible. It
would be nice if you followed the Ubuntu example (and naming), the only
difference is probably
that logind should be kept as part of systemd binary package.
[1]:
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/gnome-panel/3.8.0-1/14_revert_timedate_change.patch
[2]: http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/amd64/systemd-services/filelist
--
Dmitry Shachnev
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:06:13 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Background: Currently in gnome-panel we have a patch [1] that reverts the use
> of timedated
> service, as it is currently impossible to use it without adding a hard
> dependency on systemd,
> which we would like to avoid.
We no longer have this patch, and thus are quite happy with the current
state of things.
--
Dmitry Shachnev
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
