Am 24.08.2015 um 08:21 schrieb Johannes Schauer:
> Hi all,
>
> Quoting Helmut Grohne (2015-08-24 07:32:16)
>> If I remember correctly, dpkg-gencontrol reduces architecture and
>> profile restrictions, so these work by chance.
>
>
>> It is not clear how to implement :native for mk-build-deps, because it does
>> not differentiate between build architecture and host architecture. Maybe the
>> simplest fix would be to s/:native// in mk-build-deps and declare cross
>> support unfixably broken. Dima Kogan already observed that it does not work
>> at all in #794538.
>
> This is fixable. It has to be because building a binary package to satisfy
> dependencies already works in other situations while still being cross-aware,
> most notably in sbuild.
>
> Namely, what mk-build-deps should do is to copy the sbuild behaviour:
>
> - use libdpkg-perl to parse and process the Build-{Depends,Conflicts}* fields
> and filter architecture and profile restrictions correctly
> - change the meaning of its --arch option (this currently does some magic
> depending on whether the source package has architecture specific build
> dependencies or not):
> - this option should specify the HOST architecture
> - the generated binary package should be of this architecture (this is
> already the case)
> - foo:native dependencies should be converted to foo:$build
> - the dependency on build-essential should be build-essential:$build
> - if host != build, then an additional build dependency on
> crossbuild-essential-$host:$build should be added
> - change the created binary package name to have "cross" or a similar
> identifier in its name so that it can be installed at the same time
> with a package for a native build for the same source package
>
> Doing all this is not very hard and the code even already exists in perl in
> the
> function setup_apt_archive() in the sbuild source code at
> lib/Sbuild/ResolverBase.pm:
>
>
> http://sources.debian.net/src/sbuild/0.65.2-1.1/lib/Sbuild/ResolverBase.pm/#L692
>
>> Actually, is there any use of mk-build-deps after experimental's apt has
>> transitioned to unstable? It allows "apt-get build-dep foo.dsc" and "apt-get
>> build-dep extracted-package". Just wondering.
>
> Yes. mk-build-deps creates a meta package that is easily identifiable, so it
> makes it easy to keep track of the list of source packages for which I
> installed their build dependencies on my system, so that I can easily select
> which ones I want to keep or remove.
>
> I assume that the new "apt-get build-dep foo.dsc" code marks the newly
> installed binaries as manually installed, so it is harder to remove them. With
> mk-build-deps, only the meta package is marked as manually installed and the
> rest can easily be removed by the removal of the meta package with "apt-get
> autoremove".That, and the point that with mk-build-depends I can easily work from my git checkout, where I usually don't have any .dsc, but only the debian/ directory. >> It is also unclear how to ever implement full build profile support into >> mk-build-deps. It seems that the generated package name should not only >> depend on B-D vs. B-D-I and the source package name, but also on selected >> profiles. > > Yes. But right now, mk-build-deps doesn't even allow selecting any build > profiles, this is a separate feature request. Once it does it probably wants > to > use libdpkg-perl and in that case it has to be careful also to read the > environment variable DEB_BUILD_PROFILES when it inserts the selected build > profiles into the output package name. It would be great if one of you can follow up on #794538 (or file a new bug report against devscripts), since you obviously are in a much better position to explain any details to the maintainer of mk-build-deps. For the time being, I'm ok with installing the b-deps manually, so I'd keep what we have in systemd.git if there is a plan to get this fixed eventually. Thank you both for the quick reply. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
