Am 14.10.2015 um 14:48 schrieb Felipe Sateler: > On 14 October 2015 at 08:41, Michael Biebl <[email protected]> wrote: >> Am 14.10.2015 um 10:39 schrieb Martin Pitt: >>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=5daf857 >>> >>> Although this is really a tangent to this thread, as there are other >>> conffiles which we can't remove that easily. > > I've been thinking there is another problem: dbus-daemon does not > support reexecs. This means that the system will be in a broken state > until it reboots. I think at the very least a NEWS item should be > added.
That's a valid point. I wonder whether we should start moving the policy files after stretch because of this. >> Small nit: For systemd, where dbus is only a recommends, versioning the >> recommends is not really sufficient to ensure a recent enough version. >> We'd also have to add a versioned Breaks. > > dbus has a strict dependency on libdbus-1-3 (at least in sid, it > doesn't appear so in jessie). The versioned Build-Depends on > libdbus-1-dev should propagate to the binary Depends (if libdbus has a > symbols file, which IIRC it does), which in turn should forbid an old > dbus-daemon. > Well, libdbus-1-dev is only required for the test-suite, systemd itself doesn't use libdbus anymore. So there will be no (versioned) dependency on libdbus-1-3 which would enforce the correct dbus version. CCed Simon for this thoughts on this. Maybe it's too early to move the policy files around Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
