Your message dated Sat, 30 Jan 2016 15:42:51 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#771153: init-system-helpers: Please do not depend on
new perl
has caused the Debian Bug report #771153,
regarding init-system-helpers: Please do not depend on new perl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
771153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771153
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: init-system-helpers
Version: 1.22
init-system-helpers 1.22 introduced a versioned Depends: on
perl-base. This needlessly complicates upgrades and backports by
forcing perl and its reverse dependencies to be upgraded when
installing init-system-helpers and its reverse dependencies.
Please change
Depends: perl-base (>= 5.20.1-3)
into
Depends: perl-base (>= 5.20.1-3) | perl
to allow this dependency to be satisfied by perl from wheezy.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Stepan
Am 30.01.2016 um 10:56 schrieb Stepan Golosunov:
> 19.01.2016 в 00:38:19 +0100 Michael Biebl написал:
>> Am 27.11.2014 um 07:08 schrieb Stepan Golosunov:
>>> Package: init-system-helpers
>>> Version: 1.22
>>>
>>> init-system-helpers 1.22 introduced a versioned Depends: on
>>> perl-base. This needlessly complicates upgrades and backports by
>>> forcing perl and its reverse dependencies to be upgraded when
>>> installing init-system-helpers and its reverse dependencies.
>>>
>>>
>>> Please change
>>>
>>> Depends: perl-base (>= 5.20.1-3)
>>>
>>> into
>>>
>>> Depends: perl-base (>= 5.20.1-3) | perl
>>>
>>> to allow this dependency to be satisfied by perl from wheezy.
>>
>> Jessie has been released for a while and we didn't receive any bug
>> reports related to upgrade problems.
>>
>> In you initial bug report you wrote that this would complicate upgrades.
>> Apparently this didn't really happen, so I guess this bug can be closed
>> now. Or do you still see value in keeping this bug report open (and if
>> so, why).
>
> It does complicate upgrades, but probably not too much.
> At this stage it's probably not worth fixing, so it probably can be
> closed.
I agree. Closing the bug report.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
