On 9 June 2016 at 01:57, Martin Pitt <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael Biebl [2016-06-09 2:29 +0200]: >> At some point, shuffling the libraries around becomes a nuisance. Maybe >> we should only do that for /lib/systemd/systemd and eventually >> /lib/systemd/systemd-udevd. > > We got two RC bugs before we had this check, but I don't remember > whether this was before the initramfs-tools change that mounts /usr. > But even with that I'm sure that we have a very small number of users > who believe that separate /usr without initramfs was ever supported, > and I'm sort of tired about arguing against that..
I would leave the /lib checks for things that can conceivably be used without systemd as PID1. That would be only udev, libudev and libsystemd (and maybe systemctl). For the rest, I would add a reportbug snippet that would indicate whether /usr is a separate mount, and whether initramfs-tools or dracut is not new enough. Plus a NEWS.Debian entry, possibly. And then proceed to close as notabug when late-mounted-/usr bugs are opened. I don't think pretending to support something that we do not is good for anybody. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
