On Thursday 16 June 2016 00:26:59 Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Dear Michael, > > On Monday, 6 June 2016 1:53:02 PM AEST Michael Biebl wrote: > > Now, regarding my concerns: The size increase is one (which will affect > > everyone if we ship it s part of the systemd package). > > Michael, I don't know how to respond to this. It was mentioned that size > increase we are talking about is only 380k (uncompressed) which is 1/3 of a > floppy disk. Seriously? How can this be a concern these days in 2016?
Recording some IRC discussion from today on #debian-systemd, it looks like the current plan is to first do some space saving changes upstream, via the PR referenced below, and then systemd-sysusers size won't be anymore a concern and can get into systemd proper: ``` <kaeso> pitti, fsateler, mbiebl_: is there any chance we can reach at least a stopgap solution wrt. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823322 ? <pitti> kaeso: if/once we can land fsateler's link branch, this shouldn't actually be a concern any more :) <kaeso> pitti: which one? (I'm probably missing some backlog/ref) <fsateler> kaeso: pitti I was just writing a reply referencing that branch <fsateler> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/3516 <kaeso> fsateler: thanks for the ref. So the idea is that saving space on lib side will let enough room to let systemd-sysusers in? fsateler> kaeso: not only that, but the sysusers binary itself will be smaller ``` Ciao, Luca
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
