Alexander Kurtz [2016-10-30 22:05 +0100]:
> Thanks a lot for your quick reply! You might want to consider also
> adding "armhf" to that list, since both gnu-efi [0] and u-boot-rpi [1]
> are also available there (in contrast to "armel" where gnu-efi is
> missing).

I know that arm64 EFI boot works (Canonical uses it in their internal
OpenStack deployment), but as far as I know there is no existing
armhf EFI implementation; so this would mean to ship dead bits. Or are
you aware of any platform where this could actually be tested?

Thanks,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers

Reply via email to