[Justin B Rye] > The argument that convinced me was the one about enabling > concurrency. I don't know how much it really improved my booting > speed (it was probably switching to dash that had the most effect), > but CONCURRENCY=shell got all the credit because it had the most > visible impact.
Good to hear. If you like the speed of CONCURRENCY=shell, you should try CONCURRENCY=makefile. :) But be aware that it require close to perfect dependency information in the init.d scripts. :) > How about if we boiled down the reasons to something like this: I like this better. :) But I must admit, that to me the chance of getting a correct boot sequence and fix a lot of long standing bugs in the boot and shutdown ordering is most important. I guess there is no need to write the messages with focus on what would convince me. :) > Then in the README perhaps it would be a good idea to separate the > user-oriented and developer-oriented advantages, since only the > former are really relevant to admins trying to decide whether to > migrate. Here's another attempt at a rewrite: Sound good. :) > By the way, did anybody ever find out why insserv is called insserv? I have no idea. :) Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen _______________________________________________ Pkg-sysvinit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sysvinit-devel
